Skip to main content

Table 4 (A) Relative monitoring frequency for each csDMARD compared to methotrexate by respondent percentage, N = 187#; (B) change in monitoring frequency for each csDMARD combination by respondent percentage, N = 173#; (C) change in monitoring frequency for each co-morbidity by respondent percentage, N = 173#

From: Attitudes and practices in the laboratory monitoring of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs by rheumatologists and rheumatology trainees

A: csDMARD

More (N, %)*

Less (N, %)*

Equal (N, %)*

No monitoring (N, %)*

Not prescribed (N, %)*

(A)

Leflunomide

8 (4%)

8 (4%)

168 (90%)

0 (0%)

3 (2%)

Sulfasalazine

12 (6%)

75 (40%)

97 (52%)

1 (1%)

2 (1%)

Hydroxychloroquine

0 (0%)

81 (43%)

20 (11%)

86 (46%)

0 (0%)

Azathioprine

33 (18%)

7 (4%)

141 (75%)

1 (1%)

5 (3%)

Mycophenolate

26 (14%)

11 (6%)

142 (76%)

0 (0%)

8 (4%)

Tacrolimus and other calcineurin inhibitors

30 (16%)

4 (2%)

81 (43%)

4 (2%)

68 (36%)

csDMARD combination

More (N, %)*

Less (N, %)*

Equal (N, %)*

 

Not prescribed (N, %)*

(B)

Methotrexate/leflunomide

76 (44%)*

0 (0%)

73 (42%)

 

24 (14%)

Methotrexate/sulfasalazine

19 (11%)

2 (1%)

145 (84%)

 

7 (4%)

Methotrexate/hydroxychloroquine

4 (2%)

3 (2%)

166 (96%)

 

0 (0%)

Sulfasalazine/hydroxychloroquine

3 (2%)

16 (9%)

147 (85%)

 

7 (4%)

Leflunomide/hydroxychloroquine

6 (3%)

3 (2%)

154 (89%)

 

10 (6%)

Sulfasalazine/leflunomide

28 (16%)

2 (1%)

131 (76%)

 

12 (7%)

Co-morbidity

More (N, %)*

Less (N, %)*

Equal (N, %)*

Cease csDMARD (N, %)*

 

(C)

Obesity

26 (15%)*

1 (1%)

146 (84%)

0 (0%)

 

Fatty liver disease

120 (69%)

2 (1%)

51 (29%)

0 (0%)

 

Other liver disease

126 (73%)

2 (1%)

35 (20%)

10 (6%)

 

Alcohol intake above NHMRC Guideline

104 (60%)

1 (1%)

47 (27%)

21 (12%)

 

Existing cytopenias

145 (84%)

0 (0%)

19 (11%)

9 (5%)

 

eGFR < 30

121 (70%)

1 (1%)

20 (12%)

31 (18%)

 

eGFR 30–60

75 (43%)

3 (2%)

93 (54%)

2 (1%)

 

18–60 years old

3 (2%)

8 (5%)

162 (94%)

0 (0%)

 

60–80 years old

33 (19%)

4 (2%)

136 (79%)

0 (0%)

 

> 80 years old

78 (45%)

2 (1%)

89 (51%)

4 (2%)

 
  1. #Change in monitoring frequency data unavailable for whole cohort (N = 221)
  2. *Percentages are all rounded to the nearest whole number (including 0 and 100) and thus some differing raw numbers show the same percent and non-0 raw numbers may show 0%