Skip to main content

Table 3 Cross-referencing of Delphi best-practice rheumatology service statements to themes from patient data, and generation of new statements and overarching principles to themes without a match

From: Patient participation in defining best-practice rheumatology service provision in Aotearoa New Zealand: a qualitative study with service consumers

Subthemes

Mapped to Delphi best practice statement (No or number of statement)

Statement or principle encompassing patient views derived from data

Value individuals and their experiences

No

New principle 1: A rheumatology service should value individuals and their experiences through positive interpersonal interactions, supportive relationships and within a health system organised with the patients’ needs at the centre

System

No

Interpersonal

No

Relationship with professionals is supportive

No

Importance of relationships with professionals in the rheumatology service

No

New statement 23: Patients should have specific rheumatologist(s) responsible for their care and be provided with the names and roles of other medical, nursing, allied health and administrative staff who may be involved in their care

Rheumatologists

No

Nurses

No

Support/admin staff organising appointments

No

Supporting self-management

No

New principle 2:  Healthcare professionals in a rheumatology service actively support patients to participate in decision-making and self-management

Supporting active participation in decision-making and care

No

Education requirements met

5

New principle 3: Healthcare professionals in a rheumatology service should ensure patients’ education requirements about their rheumatic condition are met; including appropriate communication, content, and framed to support patients’ active involvement in shared decision-making

Right language for effective communication

No

About condition and management

No

To make informed decisions

No

Rheumatology specialist care

4, 16

 

Timeliness

2, 3, 16

 

Of diagnosis

2,3,16

 

Appointments (including appointment certainty)

No

Carer—Outside of rheumatology—primary/community health provision

Appropriately responsive care access mechanisms

8, 16, 21

 

Patient-factors related to access

20

 

Telehealth

20

 

Funding

No

Funding for allied health—Outside of rheumatology—primary/community health provision

Mobility pass

No

Mobility pass—Outside of rheumatology—primary/community health provision

Access to rheumatology nurses is highly important

3, 5, 6, 7, 8

NEW STATEMENT 24: A public rheumatology service should involve at least one full time equivalent (FTE) rheumatologist nurse per FTE rheumatologist

Between appointments

7

Nurse phone line

6, 7

  

Access to Pain MDT—Outside of rheumatology—Other DHB service

Co-ordinated care and other aspects of care

15

 

Between specialists

15

 

Between DHBs

No

DHB/service communication Outside of rheumatology—whole of DHB

Across disciplines (non-specialist)

No

DHB/service communication Outside of rheumatology—whole of DHB

Allied health

9, 10, 11, 15

 

Physiotherapy

11

 

Occupational therapy

9

 

Personal trainer

No

Personal trainer—Outside of rheumatology—primary/community health provision

Carer

No

Carer—Outside of rheumatology—primary/community health provision

Orthotics/podiatrist

10

 

Pharmacy

No

Pharmacist—Outside of rheumatology—primary/community health provision

Oral hygienist

No

Dental hygienist—Outside of rheumatology—primary/community health provision

Access to specialist multidisciplinary care when relevant

13

 

Pain

13

 

System navigation

No

New statement 25: Rheumatology services should actively provide information to patients with rheumatic diseases about outside services or providers that provide social, emotional or practical support

Support groups

No

Other services

No

Access to personal health information

No

Access to personal health information—Outside of rheumatology—whole of DHB

  1. Abbreviations: DHB District Health Board, MDT multidisciplinary team