Skip to main content
Download PDF

Possible giant cell arteritis symptoms are common in newly diagnosed patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica: results from an incident primary care PMR cohort

BMC Rheumatology volume 1, Article number: 7 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To examine the frequency of possible giant cell arteritis (GCA) symptoms (including headache, temporal/scalp tenderness, jaw claudication and visual symptoms) in newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients in UK primary care.

Methods

The PMR Cohort Study is a primary care inception cohort of 652 adults with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). At baseline, participants were asked to report (yes/no) on the presence of seven potential GCA symptoms: sudden headache, tender scalp, disturbed/double vision, jaw claudication, fever, appetite loss and unintentional weight loss.

Results

Of the 652 patients, 405 (62%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 72.5 (8.9) years. Sudden headache was the commonest symptom in 161 patients (24.7%). The least commonly reported symptom was jaw claudication in 66 (10.1%) patients. Females had a higher prevalence of headache, tender scalp and jaw pain. Sudden onset headache and fever were commoner in younger patients, (OR (95% CI) per 10 year age band increase: headache 0.76 (0.62–0.92), fever 0.63 (0.49, 0.79)). In those reporting sudden headache (n = 161), 19.9% (n = 32) also reported double/disturbed vision and a tender scalp, whilst 11.8% (n = 19) reported double/disturbed vision and jaw pain.

Conclusion

The data suggests possible GCA symptoms are common in PMR patients, particularly sudden headache, appetite loss and weight loss. These symptomatic PMR patients warrant careful monitoring and consideration for early referral to specialist services.

Background

Giant cell arteritis (GCA, or temporal arteritis) is a systemic large vessel vasculitis with a tendency to affect the aortic and extracranial branches, such as superficial temporal arteries [1]. GCA affects older adults (typically those >50 years) with an estimated annual incidence of 1 per 10,000 per year in those over 40 years [2]. Its aetiology is currently unknown, other than it is an immune mediated disease which has a clear association with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and females are affected up to three times more frequently than males [3].

Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GCA is essential to prevent complications such as irreversible blindness [4]. Common symptoms of GCA include headache, temporal/scalp tenderness, jaw claudication and diplopia. However, studies suggest that there may be an over-reliance on headache as a presenting feature of GCA with one study suggesting a prevalence of headache of 72%, [5], but with audit data suggesting those without headache are at increased risk of visual loss, perhaps as a consequence of delayed recognition [6]. It is especially important for those with PMR to be monitored for signs and symptoms of GCA, as it has been reported in secondary care populations that between 16 and 21% [3, 7, 8] of those with PMR will develop GCA at some point in their disease course. However, this may be different in community populations with PMR, and it is not clear to what extent this overlap is present in the community setting. This study aims to describe the prevalence of common symptoms that are potentially indicative of GCA in a cohort of English adults with incident PMR diagnosed in primary care.

Methods

Study design

The PMR Cohort Study is a cohort of 652 adults with newly diagnosed PMR recruited in primary care. The study has been described in detail elsewhere [9, 10]. Briefly, GP’s entering a first Read Code for PMR were invited to refer patients into the study and encouraged to request the recommended blood tests. All participating general practices were provided with copies of the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for the management of PMR [11]. Between June 2012 and June 2014, patients with a new primary care diagnosis of PMR were referred into the study by their GP and mailed a baseline questionnaire. This included information regarding PMR symptoms (current pain and stiffness using a numeric rating scale (NRS)), lifestyle factors and socio-demographics. Participants were also asked to report (yes/no) on the presence of seven potential symptoms of GCA including sudden onset headache, tender scalp, disturbed/double vision, jaw pain on chewing, temperature/fever, appetite loss and unintentional weight loss. Following completion of the baseline questionnaire, participants were followed-up by postal questionnaire at regular intervals for two years, with medical record review at the end of the study in those consenting, for recorded symptoms, treatment and diagnoses. The current study uses data from the baseline questionnaire only.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. The prevalence of GCA symptoms was calculated as a percentage. Comparisons of prevalence were made across genders and age (in 10-year age bands) using cross tabulation and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The prevalence of pairs of GCA symptoms was also investigated using simple descriptive statistics. As headache is an important symptom of GCA, but is relatively common in the general non-PMR population, the prevalence of combinations of symptoms with headache were also investigated.

Results

Of the 652 incident PMR cases the mean (SD) age was 72.5 (8.9) years and 405 (62%) were female. Table 1 shows the baseline demographics and clinical features of the cohort. The median (IQR) time from referral into the cohort to the baseline postal questionnaire being received was 16 (11, 23) days. Sudden onset headache (161, 24.7% patients), appetite loss (140, 21.5%) and unintended weight loss (137, 21%) were the most common symptoms (Table 2). Females were significantly more likely to report all symptoms than men, with the exception of unintentional weight loss, where there was no gender difference. (Table 2). Sudden onset headache and fever were the only symptoms significantly associated with age, with younger patients more likely to experience these symptoms (OR (95% CI) for headache per 10-year increase 0.76; 0.62–0.92) and fever (OR (95% CI) per 10-year increase 0.63 (0.49, 0.79)).

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the sample
Full size table
Table 2 Possible GCA Symptoms
Full size table

Pairs of GCA symptoms

In terms of symptom pairs, headache and tender scalp were the most common combination pair of symptoms with a prevalence of 10.1%, followed by headache and double vision (9.5%) (Table 3). In those reporting sudden headache (n = 161) (Table 2), 19.9% (n = 32) also reported double/disturbed vision and a tender scalp, whilst 11.8% (n = 19) reported double/disturbed vision and jaw pain. Double/disturbed vision, tender scalp and jaw pain was reported by 13 individuals (8.1%) reporting sudden headache.

Table 3 Symptom combinations in those with PMR
Full size table

Discussion

This study of incident PMR cases suggests that classical GCA symptoms are common in newly diagnosed PMR patients, with 1 in 4 patients reporting sudden headache, appetite loss or unintentional weight loss. Jaw pain on chewing was the least common reported symptom. Except for unintentional weight loss, a higher proportion of females reported all symptoms, whilst sudden headache, double vision and fever were reported by fewer people at older ages. Given that older patients seem to be at greater risk of both developing GCA and of visual loss (7) it may be that reporting of these symptoms is more specific in older individuals, who may report fewer symptoms but be at greater risk of complications. The most common combination of symptoms was headache with tender scalp and headache with double vision, each affecting approximately 10% of the cohort at diagnosis. Further follow up of the cohort will determine the proportion of patients who were formally diagnosed as having GCA.

The PMR Cohort study is the first inception cohort study of PMR patients in primary care and is of a substantial size. Although primary care recruitment can be seen as a weakness, because no specialist opinion as to the diagnosis was sought, this is also a major strength of the study because the majority of patients with PMR are diagnosed and managed exclusively in primary care [12]. This sample is therefore free of the potential spectrum bias that is likely to be present in studies conducted in specialist settings where disease may be more severe, atypical or difficult to manage. Reassuringly however, the demographic and clinical characteristics of this cohort are similar to other secondary care cohorts [13], providing confidence in the accuracy of the primary care PMR diagnosis. Furthermore symptoms were recorded from patients close to the time of diagnosis thus reducing the recall bias.

One of the limitations of this study is that at this stage it is unknown if the patient was formally diagnosed with GCA or not. The prevalence of possible GCA symptoms was higher in women in our cohort, in common with the reported higher prevalence of GCA in women. [7]. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that in patients with PMR, headache is a much commoner symptom than in the older adult general population. Work by Steiner et al. [14] demonstrated that in the older adult general population (aged 50–65) the prevalence of headache was 3.4% for males and 13.5% for females The prevalence of headache was considerably higher in our cohort (males 15.4%, females 30.4%), suggesting that PMR is associated with an increase in reported headaches, which may reflect the overlap with giant cell arteritis, or that some cases of GCA are not being recognised or misdiagnosed. Although females have a higher prevalence of headaches overall, males saw a much bigger increase in the prevalence of headaches compared with a similar age general population group. However, a Danish population survey suggested the prevalence of headache to be 36.5%, although only 17% had consulted primary care because of headache symptoms [15]. Previous studies comparing patients with isolated PMR and those who went onto develop GCA have suggested that new onset headache is a key predictor [16, 17], with others suggesting that the headache is over-relied on in making a GCA diagnosis [5, 6].

Given that single symptoms such as headache are common both in the general population and in those with PMR it may be that combinations of symptoms are more useful in identifying patients at risk of GCA. Headache and tender scalp are two of the most common symptoms reported in those diagnosed with GCA and were reported by around 10% of this PMR Cohort. Further follow-up will assess whether these patients were initially misdiagnosed as PMR instead of GCA, together with further assessment of the utility of combinations of symptoms in predicting those patients at higher risk of GCA.

Conclusions

In summary, within a cohort of primary care patients newly diagnosed with PMR, symptoms suggestive of possible GCA, such as headache, tender scalp and visual disturbance are common. These occur in more than 1 in 4 patients and at higher rates than in the older age UK general population. Given the risk of irreversible visual loss in those with untreated GCA it may be that PMR patients who have these symptoms warrant closer monitoring and follow up to ensure that GCA does not develop and that symptoms do not progress. Future follow-up of this cohort will enable greater understanding of the proportions of primary care PMR patients who develop GCA and the risk factors for GCA development. Enabling risk stratification of PMR patients could facilitate GP education (regarding patients at higher risk) and more effective referral or treatment interventions to reduce the impact of this potentially serious complication.

Abbreviations

GCA:

giant cell arteritis

GP:

general practitioner

PMR:

polymyalgia rheumatica

References

  1. 1.

    Nordborg E, Nordborg C. Giant cell arteritis: epidemiological clues to its pathogenesis and an update on its treatment. Rheumatology. 2003 March;42:413–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Petri H, Nevitt A, Sarsour K, Napalkov P, Collinson N, Incidence of giant cell arteritis, characteristics of patients: data-driven analysis of comorbidities. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015;67(3):390–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Smeeth L, Cook C, Hall AJ. Incidence of diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis in the United Kingdom, 1990–2001. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 August;65(8):1093–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Salvarani C, Cantini F, Hunder GG. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. Lancet. 2008 July 19;327:234–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Smith JH, Swanson JW. Giant cell arteritis. Headache. 2014 Sep;54(8):1273–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ezeonyeji AN, Borg FA, Dasgupta B. Delays in recognition and management of giant cell arteritis: results from a retrospective audit. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):259–62.2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gonzalez-Gay MA, Vazquez-Rodriguez TR, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Miranda-Filloy JA, Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Martin J, Llorca J. Epidemiology of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Oct 15;61(10):1454–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Narváez J, Estrada P, López-Vives L, Ricse M, Zacarías A, Heredia S, Gómez-Vaquero C, Nolla JM. Prevalence of ischemic complications in patients with giant cell arteritis presenting with apparently isolated polymyalgia rheumatica. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Dec;45(3):328–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Muller S, Hider S, Helliwell T, Bailey J, Barraclough K, Cope L, Dasgupta B, Foskett R, Hughes R, Mayson Z, Purcell C, Roddy E, Wathall S, Zwierska I, Mallen CD. The epidemiology of polymyalgia rheumatica in primary care: a research protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 15;13:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Muller S, Hider SL, Helliwell T, Lawton S, Barraclough K, Dasgupta B, Zwierska I, Mallen CD. Characterising those with incident polymyalgia rheumatica in primary care: results from the PMR cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Sep 7;18:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1097-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dasgupta B, Borg FA, Hassan N, Barraclough K, Bourke B, Fulcher J, et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Jan;49(1):186–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Helliwell T, Hider SL, Barraclough K, Dasgupta B, Mallen CD. Diagnosis and management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 May;62(598):275–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mackie SL, Hensor EM, Haugeberg G, Bhakta B, Pease CT. Can the prognosis of polymyalgia rheumatica be predicted at disease onset? Results from a 5-year prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Apr;49(4):716–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Steiner TJ, Scher AI, Stewart WF, Kolodner K, Liberman J, Lipton RB. The prevalence and disability burden of adult migraine in England. Cephalalgia. 2003;23:519–27.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Elnegaard S, Andersen RS, Pedersen AF, Larsen PV, Søndergaard J, Rasmussen S, Balasubramaniam K, Svendsen RP, Vedsted P, Jarbøl DE. Self-reported symptoms and healthcare seeking in the general population--exploring “he symptom iceberg” BMC Public Health 2015 Jul 21;15:685. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2034-5.

  16. 16.

    Rodriguez-Valverde V, Sarabia JM, González-Gay MA, Figueroa M, Armona J, Blanco R, et al. Risk factors and predictive models of giant cell arteritis in polymyalgia rheumatica. Am J Med. 1997 April;102(4):331–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    González-Gay M, Blanco R, Rodríguez-Valverde V, Martínez-Taboada V, Delgado-Rodriguez M, Figueroa M, et al. Permanent visual loss and cerebrovascular accidents in giant cell arteritis: predictors and response to

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff at Keele University’s Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, the Keele Clinical Trials Unit, and the staff and patients of the participating practices and NIHR Clinical Research Networks.

We wish to thank those who reviewed the manuscript for their constructive comments (Additional file 1).

Funding

This work was funded by an Arthritis Research UK Clinician Scientist Award. CDM is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West Midlands, the NIHR School for Primary Care Research and a NIHR Research Professorship in General Practice (NIHR-RP-2014-04-026). TH is funded by a NIHR Clinical Lectureship in General Practice. SM and JP are funded by the NIHR SPCR. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK

    William Masson, Sara Muller, Rebecca Whittle, James Prior, Toby Helliwell, Christian Mallen & Samantha L. Hider

  2. Rheumatology Department, Haywood Rheumatology Centre, Staffordshire, ST6 7AG, UK

    Samantha L. Hider

Authors
  1. William Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara Muller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca Whittle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James Prior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toby Helliwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Mallen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Samantha L. Hider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design (WM, SM, RW, JP, TH, CM, SH) or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data (SM, SH, TH, CM). All authors been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content and have given final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha L. Hider.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

N/A

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was received from the Staffordshire Research Ethics Committee (REC reference number: 12/WM/0021) and all patients provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

N/A

Competing interests

Dr. J Prior is a member of the editorial board of BMC Rheumatology. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Reviewer reports and AU response to reviewers. (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masson, W., Muller, S., Whittle, R. et al. Possible giant cell arteritis symptoms are common in newly diagnosed patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica: results from an incident primary care PMR cohort. BMC Rheumatol 1, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-017-0007-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Polymyalgia rheumatica
  • Giant cell arteritis
  • Headache

BMC Rheumatology

ISSN: 2520-1026

Contact us