Skip to main content
  • Study protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

A phase II trial protocol of Tocilizumab in anti-TNF refractory patients with JIA-associated uveitis (the APTITUDE trial)



Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in children. Children with JIA are at risk of intraocular inflammation (uveitis). In the initial stages of mild-moderate inflammation uveitis is asymptomatic. Most children with mild-moderate uveitis are managed on topical steroid drops with or without systemic methotrexate (MTX). When children with moderate-severe uveitis are refractory to MTX, monoclonal anti-tumour necrosis factor agents have been trialled, interim analysis data showed positive results. However, several children with severe recalcitrant disease or non-responsive to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents remain and are at greater risk of significant ocular complications and visual loss. Further evidence of alternative therapies is needed with evidence of a potential role of anti-interleukin-6 agents in the management of severe refractory uveitis.


The trial will be conducted following a two-stage Simon design. The trial will register at least 22 patients aged 2 to 18 years with active JIA-associated uveitis, who have taken MTX for at least 12 weeks and have failed an anti-TNF agent. It will take place in 7 centres across the UK. All participants will be treated for 6 months, with follow up of 9 months from registration. Participants will receive a stable dose of MTX and those weighing ≥30 kg will be dosed with 162 mg of Tocilizumab every 2 weeks and participants weighing < 30 kg dosed with 162 mg of Tocilizumab every 3 weeks. Primary outcome is treatment response at 12 weeks. Adverse events will be collected up to 30 calendar days following treatment cessation.


This is a novel adaptive design study of subcutaneous IL-6 inhibition in anti-TNF refractory JIA associated uveitis which will be able to determine if further research should be conducted. This is the first trial to look at ophthalmology outcomes in the efficacy of Tocilizumab in uveitis.

This is the first paediatric clinical trial to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab with MTX in JIA associated uveitis.

Trials registration

The Trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN95363507) on the 10/06/2015 and EU Clinical Trials Register on the 03/07/2015 (EudraCT Number: 2015–001323-23).

Peer Review reports


Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the name for a type of arthritis that primarily affects young people and whose cause is unknown. Although ‘arthritis’ refers to inflammation of the joints, in JIA the inflammation may also affect the eyes and other internal organs. Approximately 1 in 1000 children in the UK develops JIA per annum. Although both genders are affected, JIA is most common in girls. JIA is the most common rheumatic disease in children. Children with JIA also are at risk of inflammation of the uvea in the eye (uveitis). 80% of all paediatric uveitis is secondary to JIA [1, 2]. The major risk factors for development of uveitis in JIA are oligoarticular pattern of arthritis, early onset of arthritis, and antinuclear antibody positivity [3]. In the initial stages of mild to moderate inflammation the uveitis is entirely asymptomatic.

Most children with mild to moderate uveitis are managed on topical steroid drops and systemic methotrexate (MTX) as an immunosuppressive agent [4, 5]. As a significant proportion of children with moderate-severe uveitis are refractory to MTX [6,7,8], biologics in the form of monoclonal anti-TNF agents have been tried. The anti-TNF agents are effective only in 30–60% of the patients based on several retrospective case series [9]. When children with moderate-severe uveitis are refractory to MTX, monoclonal anti-TNF agents have been trialled [10] the results show that adalimumab in combination with methotrexate was effective at treating JIA-associated uveitis [11]. Unfortunately, anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy is not the panacea either for JIA alone, or JIA-associated uveitis. We know that the uveitis in some patients may still flare despite anti-TNF therapy. These children have severe recalcitrant disease that is therefore at greater risk of causing significant ocular complications and blindness.

Interleukin 6 (IL-6), glycoprotein 130, and IL-6 receptor levels are all elevated in uveitis in many studies of sampling of ocular fluids/tissues [12]. The cause of chronic disease remains unknown but auto-inflammation driving a dysregulated innate immunity will encompass an IL-6 mediated inflammatory response, particularly from mononuclear cell populations and is a consistent feature of animal models and human data to date [13]. As such, IL-6 is a suitable inflammatory pathway to therapeutically target. Not surprisingly, there are anecdotal reports of success of using anti-IL-6 therapy in the form of tocilizumab, in refractory uveitis [14,15,16].


In view of the failure of patients with refractory JIA-associated uveitis to either respond, or subsequently flare on anti-TNF therapy, and the strong evidence base for the rationale for targeting IL-6 in the disease pathogenesis, a phase II trial of the potential efficacy, safety and tolerability of anti-IL-6 therapy is being undertaken to decide whether further research is justified. Previous studies investigating the effect of Tocilizumab in paediatric arthritis have excluded patients with uveitis. However, data available for Tocilizumab used in treating uveitis in adults indicates its potential role for refractory disease [17]. A systematic search of existing data has shown limited case reports [18].

Tocilizumab (trade name RoActemra) is a biological therapy blocking the action of IL-6. In arthritis, high concentrations of IL-6 are associated with tiredness, anaemia, and inflammation and damage to bones, cartilage and tissue. Tocilizumab reduces these effects. Previous clinical trials of Tocilizumab in children with systemic-onset JIA have shown that children respond dramatically to treatment in a short time span [19]. Tocilizumab obtained National Institute for Health and Care Excellence approval for this indication and became the first drug to be licenced for the use of JIA in fifty years. The trial in polyarticular forms of JIA shows a good effect [20]. However these clinical trials for Tocilizumab state that a diagnosis of uveitis is part of the exclusion criteria and therefore no indication of efficacy in uveitis can be determined.

Tocilizumab is now the first choice biologic in children with systemic onset JIA and an important agent in the management of refractory polyarticular JIA. An ongoing Phase 1b, open-label, multicenter study to investigate the pharmacokinetics, and safety of Tocilizumab following subcutaneous administration to patient with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis is currently underway across 13 countries worldwide [21].

Potential risks and benefits

However, due care must be taken in determining the potential benefits of Tocilizumab therapy against the potential associated risks, and as such, the risk / benefit assessment of this intervention and safety is a key secondary outcome measure of the trial.

The most commonly reported Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) (occurring in ≥5% of patients treated with Tocilizumab monotherapy or in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) were upper respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, headache, hypertension and increased alanine aminotransferase test (ALT). The most serious ADRs were serious infections, complications of diverticulitis, and hypersensitivity reactions [19, 20].

Less likely in a paediatric population, rheumatoid arthritis patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular disorders such as hypertension or hyperlipemia. There are no known evidence that Tocilizumab treatment effects demyelinating disorders in a paediatric population. There are risks of local site reactions, including erythema, pain, induration and subcutaneous emphysema among others.

Of note, Tocilizumab has been shown to reduce the rate of progression of joint damage as measured by X-ray and to improve physical function when given in combination with methotrexate [20]. Tocilizumab treatment has been shown in a randomized clinical trial of polyarticular-course JIA, as well as systemic-onset JIA, as demonstrating significant improvement, maintained over time, of signs and symptoms and has a safety profile consistent with that for adults with RA [20].

In view of these data, we aimed to develop the protocol and deliver the first paediatric clinical trial that will assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in combination with MTX for the treatment of anti-tumour necrosis factor refractory JIA-associated uveitis. The protocol for this trial is presented here.


Trial design

APTITUDE is a single arm Phase II trial that will be conducted following a two-stage Simon design [20]. Figure 1 outlines the schematic of trial design and patient journey. All participants will be treated for 6 months, with follow-up after 3 months of treatment cessation (continuing on MTX throughout). Recruitment started on 3rd December 2015.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic of Study Design. *Registration should take place no later than 2 weeks after the beginning of screening

All participants will complete trial assessments as shown in Table 1. Further details are available on the trial’s website [22].

Table 1 Study visits and assessments

Study population

Children aged between 2 and less than 18 are eligible for the trial and at screening must have active uveitis defined as “2” readings of cellular infiltrate in anterior chamber of Standardisation of the Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria [23] grade ≥ 1+ or more during the preceding 6 weeks. Participants must have failed an anti-TNF agent and have been on at least one anti-TNF agent regardless of dose for at least 12 weeks at any time previously and must have been on MTX for at least 12 weeks (stable dose for 4 weeks prior to screening) and failed. Participants of reproductive potential (males and females), must use a reliable means of contraception throughout their trial participation and post pubertal females must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to registration. Exclusion criteria are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2 Exclusion Criteria

Selection of centres

Criteria for the selection of centres will be determined by the Trial Management Group based also on track record of the centre recruitment to previous trials, including trial of anti-TNF in JIA-associated uveitis [10]. Initiation of centres will be undertaken in compliance with the Clinical Trial Research Centre (CTRC) Standard Operating Procedures. Centres fulfilling the criteria will be selected to be recruitment centres for the APTITUDE trial and will be opened to recruitment upon successful completion of all global and study-specific conditions and once all necessary documents have been returned to CTRC.


Patients will receive Tocilizumab dosed according to body weight, with patients weighing ≥30 kg dosed with 162 mg of Tocilizumab every 2 weeks and patients weighing < 30 kg dosed with 162 mg of Tocilizumab every 3 weeks. Trial intervention should be given up to and including week 24. Patients weighing < 30 kg will be given a maximum of 9 injections and patients weighing ≥30 kg will be given a maximum of 13 injections.

Treatment adherence

Participants who miss two consecutive doses or three doses in total of Tocilizumab injection should cease trial treatment and will be recorded as a withdrawal from treatment.

Concomitant therapy

A complete list of concomitant therapies that are allowed during the course of the trial and those that are not permitted can be found below.

The following medications are permitted:

  • Low dose of steroids (≤0.2 mg/kg/day of prednisone or prednisolone equivalent medication orally) are permitted during the active phase of the trial.

  • Topical steroid eye drops with maximum of 6 drops/ day at registration

  • Failure to reduce eye drops to 2 drops/ day by or at the 12 week visit will be considered a treatment failure and the participant should cease trial treatment.

  • After 12 weeks topical treatment must be kept at twice per day.

  • Intraocular pressure medication apart from systemic treatment with acetazolamide

  • Maxidex, Predforte or equivalent – preparation to be stipulated at screening and to remain unchanged for individual throughout treatment-phase of trial

  • Intra-articular joint injections

The following medications are not permitted:

  • Intra-ocular or peri-ocular corticosteroid injection

  • The introduction of oral steroids, or increase in oral steroids, is not permitted at any time during the trial.

  • Intravenous methylprednisolone at any time

  • Other biologic therapies, including: etanercept, infliximab, golimumab; rituximab, abatacept, anakinra.

  • Cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, lefunamide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, any other disease modifying, anti-rheumatic drug

  • Systemic treatment with acetazolamide


Registration will be undertaken by delegated individuals at trial sites. Participants will be registered using a secure (24-h) web based registration programme.

Assessments and procedures

As described previously [10], after obtaining written consent (and assent where appropriate) from the participant, parent or legal guardian, a medical/ophthalmic history will be taken and recorded on the appropriate case report form (CRF) with particular emphasis on other disorders of relevance and allergies.

Separate sections on the CRF will be provided to record the JIA and uveitis specific medical/ophthalmic history and the participant’s other medical/surgical history. Medication (prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal supplements) use over the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit will also be recorded. Physical examination, measures of disease activity and complications, medication history, surgical history and laboratory tests (haematological and biochemical analysis and urinalysis) will be performed at the screening visit and will be repeated at each subsequent trial visit (see Table 1).

The visits are calculated from the date of the first dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP). With regards to treatment timelines, 1 month’s treatment is defined as 4 weeks; after commencing treatment the dates of each subsequent visit should be made at four weekly intervals from the date of the first dose of IMP. A window of ±7 days is allowed for these monthly visits, however for determining treatment response there should be an interval of at least 3 weeks between assessments. This means that if a patient attends a visit late (within the + 7 days window) then their next visit must not be early. The next visit must either be on the date as scheduled applying the 4 weekly intervals from first dose of IMP, or may be in the + 7 day period.

Primary endpoint

The primary endpoint is response after 12 weeks of treatment.

Response to treatment is defined as per SUN criteria [23] as a 2 step decrease in the level of inflammation (anterior chamber cells) or decrease to zero between baseline (prior to trial treatment initiation) and 12 weeks of treatment.

Secondary endpoints

A complete list of secondary endpoints can be found below.

1) Safety, tolerability and compliance

  1. a)

    Adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest

  2. b)

    Laboratory parameters (haematological and biochemical analysis and urinalysis)

  3. c)

    Participant diaries and dosing records will determine tolerability and compliance throughout the trial treatment period

2) Use of corticosteroids over duration of study period and throughout follow up, including:

  1. a.

    Total oral corticosteroid dose

  2. b.

    Reduction in and rate of systemic corticosteroid dose from entry dose

  3. c.

    Topical corticosteroid use (frequency) compared to usage at registration.

3) Optic and Ocular

  1. a.

    Visual acuity measured by age-appropriate logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution assessment

  2. b.

    Number of participants with resolution of associated optic nerve or macular oedema (as assessed by slit lamp bio microscopy or optical coherence tomography).

  3. c.

    Number of participants who are able to reduce topical or systemic agents for ocular hypertension.

  4. d.

    Number of participants with disease control (defined as zero cells, with topical treatment at 12 weeks treatment visit and 24 weeks treatment visit.)

  5. e.

    Number of participants entering disease remission (defined as zero cells, without topical treatment at 12 and 24 weeks treatment visit)

  6. f.

    Duration of sustaining inactive disease (zero cells, with or without topical treatment.)

  7. g.

    Failure to reduce eye drops to 2 drops/day by or at the 12 weeks visit

4) Quality of Life assessment (Childhood Health Questionnaire [24], (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire [25]).

5) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pedi core set criteria [26]: at ACR30, ACR50, ACR70, ACR90 and ACR100 levels.

6) Number of participants requiring change in biologic / Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs therapy due to disease flare of their arthritis or failure to respond to treatment for their arthritis.

7) Number of participants undergoing flare of arthritis [27], in remissions on and off medication of their Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis [28] and with minimum disease activity [29].

8) Participants score of the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) [30]. The JADAS comprises four components: physician global assessment of disease activity parent/patient global assessment of well-being active joint count, in 27, 71 or 10 joints; and (27) erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Sample size

The trial will be conducted following a two-stage Simon design [31]. The null hypothesis (response = 20%) reflects a response rate of no clinical benefit while the alternative hypothesis (response = 50%) reflects a desired response. The interim and final sample sizes and the critical values for abandoning Tocilizumab at each stage have been chosen to achieve the following properties. If the true success probability is 0.2 then we will recommend further study of Tocilizumab with probability less than 0.05 (falsely pursuing a non-promising therapy). If the true success probability is 0.5 then we will recommend further study of Tocilizumab with probability greater than 0.9 (correctly pursuing a promising therapy).

After 10 participants have completed their 3 month follow up there will be an interim analysis. If there are 8 or more non-treatment responses then the trial will stop with the conclusion that the study of Tocilizumab should be abandoned. If there are fewer than 8 non-treatment responses then the study will continue until a further 12 participants have received treatment, giving a total sample size of 22. If amongst these 22 participants there are 15 or more non-treatment responses then it will be concluded that the further study of Tocilizumab should be abandoned. If further study of the drug is not abandoned at either the interim of the final analysis, then a recommendation to conduct a comparative, randomised phase III trial will be made.

Formal interim analyses of the accumulating data will be performed at regular intervals (as described above) for review by an Independent Data Monitoring and Safety Committee (IDSMC). The IDSMC will make recommendations to the Trial Steering Committee as to the continuation of the trial.

Analysis plan

The analysis will be carried out according to the pre-defined statistical analysis plan, which can be seen in Additional file 1. If consent to treatment is withdrawn but the participant agrees to remain in the study for follow-up, the participant will be followed until completion. If the participant decides to withdraw consent completely, however, the reasons for withdrawal of consent will be recorded (if possible) and reported.

The primary outcome is ‘response to treatment’ and in the final analysis, point estimates and confidence intervals will be computed using the method described by Jovic and Whitehead [32].

Study organisation and funding

APTITUDE is co-ordinated from the CTRC at the University of Liverpool and is sponsored by University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, and has been developed by the UK’s Experimental Arthritis Treatment Centre for Children [33]. It is an independent trial funded by Arthritis Research UK. The trial has a Trial Steering committee (which compromises of independent members as well as the Chief Investigators, namely AR and MWB) and an Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee. The IMP is provided by Roche Products Limited.


This trial is a novel adaptive design study of subcutaneous IL-6 inhibition in anti-TNF refractory JIA associated uveitis which will be able to determine if further research into the use of this intervention for the treatment of anti-TNF refractory JIA-associated uveitis should be conducted. This is the first trial to look at ophthalmology outcomes in regards to the efficacy of Tocilizumab in uveitis. This is the first paediatric clinical trial that will assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in combination with MTX for the treatment of anti-tumour necrosis factor refractory JIA-associated uveitis. The results of this study will help decide if further investigation into the effectiveness of tocilizumab is warranted in future clinical trials.

Trial status

This summary is based on version 4.0 of the study protocol, dated 31st May 2017.

At the time of submission this trial is open in 7 Hospital sites and has recruited 19 participants.



Adverse Drug Reaction


Alanine Aminotransferase Test


Case Report Form


Clinical Trials Research Centre


Independent data and Safety Monitoring Committee




Investigational Medicinal Product


Juvenile idiopathic arthritis


Measles, mumps and rubella




Rheumatoid Arthritis


Standardisation of the Uveitis Nomenclature


Tumour necrosis factors


Upper Limit of Normal


  1. Edelsten C, Reddy MA, Stanford MR, Graham EM. Visual loss associated with pediatric uveitis in english primary and referral centers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:676–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith JA, Mackensen F, Sen HN, Leigh JF, Watkins AS, Pyatetsky D, Tessler HH, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Reed GF, Vitale S, Smith JR, Goldstein DA. Epidemiology and course of disease in childhood uveitis. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1544-51, 1551.

  3. Kanski JJ. Uveitis in juvenile chronic arthritis: incidence, clinical features and prognosis. Eye. 1988;2:641–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takken T, van der Net JJ, Helders PPJM. Methotrexate for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003129.

  5. Beresford MW, Baildam EM. New advances in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis--1: non-biological therapy. Arch Dis Child Ed Pract. 2009;94:144–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Foeldvari I, Wierk A. Methotrexate is an effective treatment for chronic uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:362–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss AH, Wallace CA, Sherry DD. Methotrexate for resistant chronic uveitis in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Pediatr. 1998;133:266–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu EN, Meniconi ME, Tufail F, Baltatzis S, Foster CS. Outcomes of treatment with immunomodulatory therapy in patients with corticosteroid-resistant juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated chronic iridocyclitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2005;13:353–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zannin ME, Birolo C, Gerloni VM, Miserocchi E, Pontikaki I, Paroli MP, Bracaglia C, Shardlow A, Parentin F, Cimaz R, Simonini G, Falcini F, Corona F, Viola S, De Marco R, Breda L, La Torre F, Vittadello F, Martini G, Zulian F. Safety and efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab for refractory uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 1-year follow-up data from the Italian registry. J Rheumatol. 2013 Jan;40:74–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramanan AV, Dick AD, Benton D, Compeyrot-Lacassagne S, Dawoud D, Hardwick B, Hickey H, Hughes D, Jones A, Woo P, Edelsten C, Beresford MW. A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis (SYCAMORE trial). Trials. 2014;15:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramanan AV, Dick AD, Jones AP, McKay A, Williamson P, Compeyrot-Lacassagne S, Hardwick B, Hickey H, Hughes D, Woo P, Benton D, Edelsten C, Beresford MW. Adalimumab plus Methotrexate for Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1637–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mesquida M, Leszczynska A, Llorenç V, Adán A. Interleukin-6 blockade in ocular inflammatory diseases. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;176:301–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Willermain F, Rosenbaum JT, Bodaghi B, Rosenzweig HL, Childers S, Behrend T, Wildner G, Dick AD. Interplay between innate and adaptive immunity in the development of non-infectious uveitis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31:182–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mesquida M, Molins B, Llorenç V, Sainz de la Maza M, Adán A. Long-term effects of tocilizumab therapy for refractory uveitis-related macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121:2380–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Calvo-Río V, Santos-Gómez M, Calvo I, González-Fernández MI, López-Montesinos B, Mesquida M, Adán A, Hernández MV, Maíz O, Atanes A, Bravo B, Modesto C, Díaz-Cordovés G, Palmou-Fontana N, Loricera J, González-Vela MC, Demetrio-Pablo R, Hernández JL, González-Gay MA, Blanco R. Anti-Interleukin-6 receptor Tocilizumab for severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated Uveitis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: a multicenter study of twenty-five patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:668–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tappeiner C, Mesquida M, Adán A, Anton J, Ramanan AV, Carreno E, Mackensen F, Kotaniemi K, de Boer JH, Bou R, de Vicuña CG, Heiligenhaus A. Evidence for Tocilizumab as a treatment option in refractory Uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;43:2183–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muselier A, Bielefeld P, Bidot S, Vinit J, Besancenot JF, Bron A. Efficacy of tocilizumab in two patients with anti-TNF-alpha refractory uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2011;19:382–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Adán A, Mesquida M, Llorenç V, Espinosa G, Molins B, Hernández MV, Pelegrín L. Tocilizumab treatment for refractory uveitis-related cystoid macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;25:2627–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Benedetti F, Brunner HI, Ruperto N, Kenwright A, Wright S, Calvo I, Cuttica R, Ravelli A, Schneider R, Woo P, Wouters C, Xavier R, Zemel L, Baildam E, Burgos-Vargas R, Dolezalova P, Garay SM, Merino R, Joos R, Grom A, Wulffraat N, Zuber Z, Zulian F, Lovell D, Martini A, PRINTO; PRCSG. Randomized trial of tocilizumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2385–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brunner H, Ruperto N, Zuber Z, Keane C, Harari O, Kenwright A, Lu P, Cuttica R, Keltsev V, Xavier RM, Calvo I, Nikishina I, Rubio-Pérez N, Alexeeva E, Chasnyk V, Horneff G, Opoka-Winiarska V, Quartier P, Silva CA, Silverman E, Spindler A, Baildam E, Gámir ML, Martin A, Rietschel C, Siri D, Smolewska E, Lovell D, Martini A, De Benedetti F, for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG). Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind withdrawal trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1110–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The European Union Clinical Trials Register. Accessed 18 July 2017.

  22. The APTITUDE trial website. Accessed 18 July 2017.

  23. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the first international workshop. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:509–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oliveira S, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, Castell E, Malattia C, Prieur AM, et al. Proxy-reported health related quality of life of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the paediatric rheumatology international trials organisation multinational quality of life cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;1:35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nugent J, Ruperto N, Grainger J, Machado C, Sawhney S, Baildam E, et al. The British version of the childhood health questionnaire (CHAQ) and the child health questionnaire (CHQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19(Suppl 23):S163–S7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giannini EH, Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Lovell DJ, Felson DT, Martini A. Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1202–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brunner HILD, Finck BK, Giannini EH. Preliminary definition of disease flare in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1058–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wallace CA, Ruperto N, Giannini E. Preliminary criteria for clinical remission for select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:2290–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Magni-Manzoni S, Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Sala E, Solari N, Palmisani E, et al. Development and validation of a preliminary definition of minimal disease activity in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1120–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Consolaro A, Rupero N, Bazso A, Pistorio A, Magni-Manzoni S, Filocamo G, et al. Development and validation of a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:658–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jovic G, Whitehead J. An exact method for analysis following a two-stage phase II cancer clinical trial. Stat Med. 2010;29:3118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. UK’s Experimental Arthritis Treatment Centre for Children. Accessed 18 July 2017.

Download references


This study was developed with the specific support of the Arthritis Research UK Experimental Arthritis Treatment Centre for Children (, and NIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility ( It is being conducted with the support of the NIHR Clinical Research Network.

The authors would like to thank all of the Principal Investigators, Rheumatologists, Ophthalmologists, Research Nurses, Pharmacists and all other staff involved in the APTITUDE trial at Hospital sites and members of the trial steering committee (Professor Peter C. Taylor (Chair), Mr. Alastair Denniston, Cliona McDowell and Miss Dhanes Thomas) and the independent data and safety monitoring committee (Dr Fabrizio De Benedetti (Chair), Dr. Hermine I. Brunner, Professor Arnd Heiligenhaus, Professor Miles Standford, and Dr. James Wason).

The authors would also like to acknowledge and thank Roche Products Limited for providing subcutaneous Tocilizumab used in the trial and for their continued advice and support (Roche Study No: ML29730).

The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Arthritis Research UK.


The APTITUDE trial is funded by Arthritis Research UK (project reference number 20659). The trial is supported by the NIHR Clinical Research Network: Children (

The funding body had no role in the design of the study and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




AR and MWB are the Co-Chief Investigators and have both led in all stages of the study concept, funding application, design, protocol development and regulatory approvals. AD, CG, BH, HH, AJ, RL and AM all participated in the writing of the protocol, design of the case report forms and preparation of regulatory applications and amendments. All of the authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Athimalaipet V. Ramanan.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

AR is a Paediatric Rheumatologist at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children and Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK. AD is Professor of Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Duke Elder Professor of Ophthalmology, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology and Joint Director of Research for Moorfields Eye Hospital and Institute of Ophthalmology, UK. CG is a Consultant Ophthalmologist at the Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK. BH is a Trial Co-ordinator at the Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. HH is Head of Trial Management at the Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. AJ is a Senior Statistician at the Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. RL is a Clinical Lecturer in Ophthalmology at the Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK. AM is a Statistician at the Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. MB is Brough Chair and Professor of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Director of the Arthritis Research UK Experimental Arthritis Treatment Centre for Children, Director of the NIHR Alder Hey Experimental Arthritis Treatment Centre, academic lead for the Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology at Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK and Specialty Cluster Lead of the NIHR CRN National Coordinating Centre Hub including the National Specialties of Children and Musculoskeletal research.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Full ethical approval has been gained from the National Research Ethics Service Committee London – South East (15/LO/0771). Full approval has also been gained from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (European Clinical Trials Database number 2015–001323-23). This trial recruits minors and young people under the age of 16 years. Informed consent procedures reflected the legal and ethical requirements to obtain valid informed consent for this population. Prior written informed consent is required for all trial participants. In obtaining and documenting informed consent, the investigator complies with applicable regulatory requirements and adheres to Good Clinical Practice and to the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Statistical analysis plan (PDF 607 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramanan, A.V., Dick, A.D., Jones, A.P. et al. A phase II trial protocol of Tocilizumab in anti-TNF refractory patients with JIA-associated uveitis (the APTITUDE trial). BMC Rheumatol 2, 4 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: