Skip to main content

A case of VEXAS syndrome presenting with unusual bone marrow granulomas: a diagnostic dilemma



VEXAS is a recently described inflammatory disease caused by mutations in the UBA1 gene. Symptoms are diverse and include fevers, cartilaginous inflammation, lung inflammation, vasculitis, neutrophilic dermatoses, and macrocytic anemia. Cytoplasmic inclusions in myeloid and erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow are a hallmark feature. Here we report the first case of VEXAS with non-caseating granulomas in the bone marrow.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old Asian male presented with fevers, erythema nodosum, inflammatory arthritis, and periorbital inflammation. Labs were significant for persistently elevated inflammatory markers and macrocytic anemia. Over the years his symptoms and inflammatory markers only improved with glucocorticoids and recurred when prednisone dose was lowered below 15–20 mg daily. He underwent bone marrow biopsy showing non-caseating granulomas and PET scan showing hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy. He was initially diagnosed with IgG4-related disease (treated with rituximab) and later sarcoidosis (treated with infliximab). After failing these agents, the possibility of VEXAS was considered and later confirmed by molecular testing.


To the best of our knowledge, this is the first observation of non-caseating granulomas in VEXAS, a cautionary reminder of its non-specificity since misinterpretation can lead to diagnostic delay. VEXAS should be in the differential in patients with symptoms of chronic inflammation responding positively to steroids (but not to B-cell depletion or TNF inhibition), which is in line with previous literature.

Peer Review reports


The recent discovery of somatic, inactivating mutations in UBA1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1) is an important defining genetic abnormality in patients presenting with a myriad of systemic inflammatory symptoms and hematologic abnormalities [1, 2]. First reported in 2020, these mutations defined a new disease referred to as VEXAS (vacuoles in myeloid precursors, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic mutation) [1]. Patients, who are men above 40 years old, develop symptoms of systemic inflammation that include fevers, ear and nose cartilage inflammation, lung inflammation, vasculitis, and skin disease. Patients may even fulfill diagnostic criteria for overlapping diseases like giant cell arteritis, relapsing polychondritis, and Sweet syndrome [3]. Hematological manifestations are a prominent feature of VEXAS, which include macrocytic anemia, cytopenias, and increased risk of myelodysplastic syndrome, plasma cell disorders, and progressive bone marrow failure [3, 4]. Sustained remission has not been obtained with standard disease modifying agents. Unfortunately, patients often must rely on long courses of prednisone to control symptoms [5, 6].

This case report describes a patient who presented with systemic inflammatory symptoms and hematologic abnormalities prior to the identification of VEXAS syndrome [1]. The presence of bone marrow granulomas, a finding not previously reported in VEXAS, led to delay in the patient’s diagnosis and management. Therefore, reporting this potential histologic finding in bone marrow evaluation is pertinent for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

Case presentation

In late summer of 2019, a 62-year-old Asian male with chronic inactive hepatitis B presented to the hospital for 1–2 weeks of left periorbital pain and swelling. Brain MRI showed findings of left preseptal and orbital cellulitis. He was empirically treated and discharged with intravenous ceftriaxone and vancomycin and symptoms improved.

During that hospital stay, however, additional labs showed positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) with a titer of 1:320 (speckled pattern), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 97 mm/hr (reference range 0–33 mm/hr), C-reactive protein (CRP) of 169 mg/L (reference range < 5 mg/L), and mildly elevated immunoglobulin subclass G4 (IgG4) of 282 mg/dL (reference range 2.4–121.0 mg/dL). Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were negative and complement C3 and C4 levels were normal. Due to concern for autoimmune etiologies, he was evaluated by our rheumatology consult service and found to have synovitis at the left third proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and right first metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. But the patient recovered well and no steroids nor further immunosuppression were recommended at the time. Subsequent outpatient labs were negative for antibodies against double stranded DNA (dsDNA) and Smith.

Two months later however, the patient developed fevers and shortness of breath. He was admitted for hypoxia and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest showed diffuse alveolar infiltrates. He was empirically started on high-dose prednisone, starting dose 60 mg daily, with significant clinical improvement. Although his diagnosis remained unclear, he established care with outpatient rheumatology where his prednisone dose was tapered over the next eight months. Clinically, he continued to feel well. Nevertheless, multiple blood tests during follow-up appointments revealed a persistently elevated serum IgG4 in the 240–270 mg/dL range. By comparison, serum IgG1 was 1100 mg/dL (reference range 341–894 mg/dL), IgG2 was 844 mg/dL (reference range 171–632 mg/dL), and IgG3 was 56.4 mg/dL (reference range 18.4–106.0 mg/dL). ESR and CRP remained at 66 to ≥ 140 mm/hr and 20–90 mg/L, respectively, and ferritin was elevated at 790 ng/mL (reference range 30–300 ng/mL). He was also noted to have persistent macrocytic anemia with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) ranging 102–128 fL (reference range 80–96 fL). Evaluation for vitamin B12 and folate deficiency, alcohol use, and liver disease was negative. Macrocytosis was attributed to his long-term use of tenofovir for hepatitis B.

A few days after the patient tapered prednisone to 7.5 mg daily, his fevers not only returned, but he also developed tender erythema nodosum in his extremities and bilateral periorbital edema. He started azathioprine as a steroid-sparing agent but continued to have a predictable episodic pattern of symptom recurrence whenever prednisone was tapered below 10 mg daily, and brisk improvement after prednisone was increased.

During a particularly severe episode in November 2020, he was admitted and found to have new-onset leukopenia (white blood cells 4,000/µL; reference range 4,400 − 11,000/µL) and thrombocytopenia (platelets 8,100/µL; reference range 150,000-450,000/µL). Hemoglobin was 12.1 g/dL (reference range 14.0-17.5 g/dL) and MCV was 108 fL. Reticulocyte index was calculated to be 0.54% (< 2%, consistent with decreased red blood cell production). He underwent fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) scan that showed diffuse hypermetabolic uptake in the bone marrow. Bone marrow trephine core biopsy and clot section were performed and showed hypercellularity (approximately 80% cellular) with myeloid predominance and erythroid hypoplasia, increased percentage of plasma cells (approximately 10% cellularity), lymphohistiocytic aggregates, and non-caseating granulomas. Erythroid and myeloid lineages showed no dysplasia. Megakaryocytes showed a range of morphologic findings with occasional hypolobated forms. Bone marrow flow cytometry revealed a minute lambda restricted monotypic plasma cell and a small atypical CD4 dim, T-cell population of unknown etiology. Grocott’s methenamine silver stain (GMS) and acid-fast bacillus (AFB) stains were performed and were negative for fungal or acid-fast organisms.

Although his serum free kappa and lambda light chains were found to be elevated (65 mg/L and 83 mg/L, respectively) and urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) showed monoclonal lambda (elevated at 408.8 mg/L), the serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) showed no monoclonal spike, other than an elevated gamma globulin ranging 2.0-2.7 g/dL (reference range 0.5–1.6 g/dL) on repeat measurements. Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) was polyclonal, even on repeat measurements over the next few years. Subsequent UPEPs did not reproduce the previously detected monoclonal protein. Over the next year, the patient continued to depend on prednisone doses ≥ 10 mg daily to control breakthrough fevers and erythema nodosum, and associated increases in his already elevated ESR and CRP.

In December 2021, considering his initial manifestations of periorbital/orbital inflammation and elevated baseline serum IgG4, azathioprine was stopped and he was started on rituximab for possible IgG4-related disease. After two infusions of rituximab 1000 mg, symptoms continued to recur. Further rituximab infusions were discontinued.

The patient underwent a second PET scan due to the continued lack of diagnosis and suspicion of malignancy. It again showed diffuse hypermetabolic uptake in the bone marrow, but newly hypermetabolic mediastinal and right hilar lymph nodes. Subsequent bronchoscopy showed multiple white, inflammatory bronchial lesions on an erythematous base, but negative infectious studies on bronchoalveolar washings. Considering the previously detected non-caseating granulomas in his bone marrow and these recent findings, we started infliximab 3 mg/kg for presumed sarcoidosis, two years from initial presentation. The patient however had no clinical improvement after six months and infliximab was discontinued after five doses.

During follow-up appointment in early 2023, the patient continued to report fevers while on prednisone 10 mg daily. He was found to have recurrent erythema nodosum, bilateral periorbital edema, active synovitis at the right third PIP joint, and worsening ESR and CRP.

Given the patient’s treatment failures to azathioprine, rituximab, and infliximab, no evidence of malignancy, and negative infectious workup, the possibility of VEXAS syndrome was considered. He had several compatible features: hypermetabolic bone marrow, macrocytic anemia, inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory lung disease, periorbital edema, erythema nodosum, and symptom relief with steroids. His previous bone marrow biopsy was reexamined and observed to contain myeloid and erythroid precursors with cytoplasmic vacuoles. Megakaryocytes showed occasional monolobated forms with rare eccentrically placed nuclei (Fig. 1). Copper levels and serologies for Coxiella burnetti infection were obtained to rule out alternative etiologies for cytoplasmic vacuoles and previously noted bone marrow granulomas, respectively. A peripheral blood sample was sent to ARUP Laboratories for next-generation sequencing (Myeloid Malignancies Mutation Panel). He was found to have a missense mutation in UBA1 (c.122T > C, pMet41Thr) with a variant allele frequency of 53%. Two other missense mutations DNMT3A (c1979A > G, pTyr660Cys) with variant allele frequency 27.3% and ASXL1 (c.3376 C > T, pHis1126Tyr) with variant allele frequency of 46.2% were noted. The DNMT3A is considered a variant of known clinical significance and the ASXL1 mutation is considered a tier 2 mutation (variant of unknown clinical significance). Hence, the diagnosis of VEXAS syndrome was made, about 3.5 years after his disease first presented.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The Wright-Giemsa stain showed a spicular and cellular marrow with myeloid predominance and no overt dysplasia. There was vacuolization in the myeloid precursors (A-C, 100x oil) and erythroid precursors (D-E, 100x oil). F shows H&E stain in a hypercellular marrow for age (approximately 80% cellular) with scattered granulomas and lymphohistiocytic infiltrates in the trephine core biopsy (4x) and in the clot section (black arrows; 20x)

Discussion and conclusions

VEXAS syndrome is an adult-onset, autoinflammatory disease first described in 2020 by Beck et al. [1]. It is caused by acquired somatic mutations in the X-linked UBA1 gene and has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 4269 males and 1 in 26,238 females older than 50 years [7]. UBA1 is essential in protein ubiquitination and defects in this process are thought to promote dysregulated innate immunity and systemic inflammation. Patients are almost always male due to the UBA1 gene’s location on the X chromosome, and symptoms typically present at age > 55 years. Clinical features are diverse, affect multiple organs, and contain aspects of rheumatologic and hematologic disease. They include systemic symptoms, ocular inflammation, chondritis, inflammatory arthritis, vasculitis, lung inflammation, neutrophilic dermatoses, blood clots, cytopenias, and macrocytic anemia. Furthermore, a particularly important feature in these patients is a positive response to steroids.

A characteristic hallmark of VEXAS is the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles in myeloid and erythroid precursors in the bone marrow, although secondary causes like chronic alcoholism, copper deficiency, and myelodysplasia should be excluded [5].

The presumptive diagnosis of IgG4-RD in our patient was not made lightly. Our patient’s CRP levels were markedly elevated, which is unusual for IgG4-RD in the absence of concurrent aortitis or infection. Moreover, we only had elevated serum IgG4 to rely on and no tissue biopsy demonstrating IgG4-positive cells, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, and/or storiform fibrosis. Unfortunately, there was no further tissue to biopsy and even PET scan at that time did not reveal other avenues to secure a tissue diagnosis. Given his significant sequela of long-term glucocorticoid use, a steroid-sparing agent was indicated. Since IgG4-RD can cause similar symptoms and there was not a better alternative diagnosis considered at the time, we elected to treat him with rituximab knowing that it covers IgG4-RD as well as many other rheumatic diseases. Although we hoped for a robust response to rituximab, a negative response would serve as another diagnostic clue to his disease.

Only after our patient’s failure to a trial of infliximab of adequate duration did we initiate work-up for VEXAS, which was confirmed by the detection of a UBA1 mutation by targeted myeloid mutational analysis by next generation sequencing. The most common mutations involve methionine 41 in exon 3 of UBA1 (Met31Thr, Met41Val, Met41Leu), although additional mutations involving serine 56 and exon 3 splice site were reported recently [2].

It is still to be determined the causative relationship of the several histologic findings in the bone marrow biopsy of VEXAS patients. Some of the most common initially described bone marrow findings include hypercellularity, myeloid predominance, erythroid hypoplasia, cytoplasmic vacuolization in erythroid and myeloid precursors, and dysplasia [8]. Recently, Olteanu et al. presented the morphologic findings of 94 cases of VEXAS syndrome and found the previously described findings in addition to abnormal findings in the megakaryocytic lineage. The megakaryocytic abnormalities included large forms with condensed pink cytoplasm (“pink bellies”), nuclear fragmentation, eccentrically placed nuclei and monolobation [9]. In our patient, the cytoplasmic vacuolization was not initially noted, but upon review of the histologic findings 3.5 years later, we could find the vacuolization in more than 5% of the myeloid and erythroid precursors. There was no dysplasia, but the megakaryocytes showed a range of morphology with occasional monolobation and rare eccentric placed nuclei.

Our case was unique in that non-caseating granulomas and lymphohistiocytic infiltrates were also detected in the bone marrow trephine core biopsy and clot section which, although nonspecific, raised concern for sarcoidosis given our patient’s symptoms of inflammatory arthritis, erythema nodosum, and ocular disease [10]. The presence of granulomas has not been previously reported in VEXAS, to the best of our knowledge. Granulomas consist of clusters of macrophages which occur in response to a pathogen, foreign body, or other immune response [11]. The granulomas in infectious etiologies are caused by an attempt to contain the antigen. However, the cause of granuloma formation in non-infectious conditions is still to be determined and may be the result of immune-mediated activation [11]. Beck et al. described how dysfunction in UBA1 in myeloid cells causes defects in ubiquitylation, leading to activation of unfolded protein and stress response pathways [1]. One can hypothesize that monocytic activation and dysregulation could have triggered an immune response to form granulomas in this case. Although this hypothesis cannot be completely confirmed, it is important to collect these cases to further identify possible pathophysiologic mechanisms for granulomatous formation in VEXAS syndrome.

About 50% of VEXAS syndrome patients can develop myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) so co-management between rheumatology and hematology/oncology is invaluable [12]. There is also a risk for plasma cell neoplasms [8]. Our patient was found to have a small lambda monotypic plasma cell population on bone marrow flow cytometry, which was not confirmed on follow up UPEP, SPEP, and IFE. In addition, we found an additional pathogenic mutation in DNA methyltransferase 3 A (DNMT3A). The enzyme encoded by DNMT3A regulates gene expression. It functions by methylating DNA at CpG sites. The missense mutation in this patient causes loss of function in this enzyme and affects all lines in hematopoiesis. DNMT3A is commonly associated with clonal hematopoiesis [13]. ASXL1 is frequently mutated in MDS. However, the mutation noted in this patient has not been previously described in myeloid malignancy and it is considered a variant of unknown significance (tier 2). Mutations in epigenetic regulators occur with increasing frequency with age and are associated with poorer prognosis in MDS [14,15,16]. Although our patient did not have clear evidence of an overt hematologic malignancy, these additional findings are consistent with a co-existing, clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), requiring vigilant monitoring for development of future myeloid malignancy [4, 17].

Another interesting finding was the presence of a distinct abnormal CD4-positive T-cell population in this case. Obiorah et al. previously described abnormalities in the flow cytometry related to increased T-cell activation and cytotoxic immunophenotype [18]. Our case did not show a cytotoxic immunophenotype, but an abnormal CD4 dim population. CD4-positive cells are important in mediating immune response against pathogens and in autoimmunity. Since this increased abnormal population has not been described in VEXAS, it is difficult to know the real cause of this finding. However, we speculate the increase may have occurred in response to the patient’s autoinflammatory state at the time of the bone marrow biopsy.

Since VEXAS was only recently described, effective treatments are still being investigated.

Sustained remission is refractory to multiple traditional immunosuppressives like B-cell depletion and TNF-alpha inhibition as seen in our patient [2, 6]. As such, glucocorticoids remain the primary treatment to control symptoms. As knowledge and recognition of this disease grows, more therapeutic options are emerging. Encouraging data shows benefits for tocilizumab, ruxolitinib, and azacytidine [6, 19]. A clinical trial is underway at the NIH investigating hematopoietic stem cell transplant, which would in theory, be curative [20].

In summary, this was a case with a protracted clinical course with multiple lines of therapy and unusual, atypical histologic findings of granulomas in the bone marrow, complicating the diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, since VEXAS syndrome is a newly described entity, it is imperative to continue reporting and documenting unusual or unexpected findings in affected patients.

Data Availability

Laboratory, imaging, and pathology data are presented in this article. Additional data not presented in this article is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies


antinuclear antibody


clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential


c-reactive protein


computed tomography angiography


double stranded DNA


erythrocyte sedimentation rate




immunoglobulin subclass G4




National Institutes of Health


positron emission tomography


proximal interphalangeal


serum protein electrophoresis


tumor necrosis factor

UBA1 :

ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1


urine protein electrophoresis


vacuoles in myeloid precursors, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic mutation


  1. Beck DB, Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, et al. Somatic mutations in uba1 and severe adult-onset autoinflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2628–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Poulter JA, Collins JC, Cargo C, et al. Novel somatic mutations in UBA1 as a cause of VEXAS syndrome. Blood. 2021;137(26):3676–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, Luo Y, et al. Somatic mutations in uba1 define a distinct subset of relapsing polychondritis patients with vexas. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(10):1886–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel BA, Ferrada MA, Grayson PC, Beck DB. VEXAS syndrome: an inflammatory and hematologic disease. Semin Hematol. 2021;58(4):201–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grayson PC, Patel BA, Young NS. VEXAS syndrome. Blood. 2021;137(26):3591–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourbon E, Heiblig M, Gerfaud Valentin M, et al. Therapeutic options in VEXAS syndrome: insights from a retrospective series. Blood. 2021;137(26):3682–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck DB, Bodian DL, Shah V, et al. Estimated prevalence and clinical manifestations of uba1 variants associated with vexas syndrome in a clinical population. JAMA. 2023;329(4):318–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel N, Dulau-Florea A, Calvo KR. Characteristic bone marrow findings in patients with UBA1 somatic mutations and VEXAS syndrome. Semin Hematol. 2021;58(4):204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Olteanu H, Patnaik M, Koster M, Warrington K, Go R, Mangaonkar A, Kourelis T, Bock A, Herrick J, Reichard K. Comprehensive Characterization of Bone Marrow Biopsy Findings in a Large Cohort of Patients with VEXAS Syndrome Reveals Distinct Morphologic Diagnostic Features: A Single-Institution Longitudinal Study of 94 Cases from 42 Individuals. PowerPoint presentation at the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Annual Meeting; March 11–16, 2023; New Orleans, LA.

  10. Mehta AC, Ali SR. Mnemonic for the differential diagnosis of non-caseating granulomas. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2017;34(2):200–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pagán AJ, Ramakrishnan L. The formation and function of granulomas. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:639–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Templé M, Kosmider O. Vexas syndrome: a novelty in mds landscape. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(7):1590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marnell CS, Bick A, Natarajan P. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (chip): linking somatic mutations, hematopoiesis, chronic inflammation and cardiovascular disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021;161:98–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ley TJ, Ding L, Walter MJ, et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(25):2424–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gelsi-Boyer V, Brecqueville M, Devillier R, Murati A, Mozziconacci MJ, Birnbaum D. Mutations in ASXL1 are associated with poor prognosis across the spectrum of malignant myeloid diseases. J Hematol Oncol. 2012;5:12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang A, Wang S, Ren Q, Wang Y, Jiang Z. Prognostic value of ASXL1 mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Published online December 5, 2022.

  17. Kusne Y, Fernandez J, Patnaik MM. Clonal hematopoiesis and VEXAS syndrome: survival of the fittest clones? Semin Hematol. 2021;58(4):226–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Obiorah IE, Patel BA, Groarke EM, et al. Benign and malignant hematologic manifestations in patients with VEXAS syndrome due to somatic mutations in UBA1. Blood Adv. 2021;5(16):3203–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Heiblig M, Ferrada MA, Koster MJ, et al. Ruxolitinib is more effective than other JAK inhibitors to treat VEXAS syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study. Blood. 2022;140(8):927–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Institutes of Health. (2021, August 31). A Phase II Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Subjects With VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 Enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) Syndrome. Retrieved April 12, 2023, from

Download references


We thank the patient and his daughter for involving us in his care and consenting to the presentation of his case.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



KV, RW, JL, and DM contributed to the manuscript text and DM prepared Fig. 1. KV, RW, JL, and DM reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khiem T. Vu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of personal and clinical details was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vu, K.T., Wolfe, R.M., Lambird, J.E. et al. A case of VEXAS syndrome presenting with unusual bone marrow granulomas: a diagnostic dilemma. BMC Rheumatol 7, 18 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: